CROSS-INDUSTRY / SUPPLIED ASSESSMENTS

Compare priorities. Keep the evidence attached.

Bring your own opportunities, ratings and evidence notes. Adjust review thresholds and priorities, then inspect a reproducible ranking and the trade-offs it leaves open.

The example is synthetic. Ratings are supplied assessments, not verified facts. Scores do not forecast revenue, returns or success. No provider, market source or evidence URL is contacted.

1. Supply your comparison

Priority weights · whole points from 0 to 100

Eligibility thresholds

Higher benefit and confidence increase the score; higher effort and risk reduce it. Weights are normalized. At least one weight must be positive.

Supplied opportunities

Keep evidence as notes or references. Each line is preserved as supplied text and is never fetched. Replace synthetic assumptions with your own measured references before decisions.

Reproduce the comparison

The original Python demo reuses the repository’s Pareto comparison engine. This browser uses parity-tested integer arithmetic and the same canonical input hash. Both preserve supplied evidence and make no external calls.

Files remain in this tab. Export to keep your work. Reopening a report ignores its saved result and recomputes from the input. Notebook evidence is also supported within the 1 MiB browser limit. For larger notebook envelopes, reopen the exported cross-industry-input.json instead.

Original runtime, schema and launch guide

Preserved historical chart replay

Project notice / Avis du projet

⬅️ Back to Gallery