Repository guide · 5 diagrams

View source on GitHub ↗
Original documentation, preserved from the repository. Historical projections and scenario ambitions are not evidence of live performance. See the current readiness record for deployment requirements.

α-AGI MARK Verification Compendium

Scope: these preserved diagrams describe a local financing-market demonstration. Chart coordinates and automation multipliers are illustrative, not empirical assurance or productivity measurements. A local check pass rate does not prove authorship, independent review, buyer value or production readiness. See the current quick start and computer-work handoff.

Empowering non-technical operators with a cinematic command of truth, trust, and telemetry.

Why this compendium exists

The α-AGI MARK demo already automates deployment, governance, and sovereign launch flows. This compendium distills the triple-verification ecosystem into a playbook a non-technical operator can present to councils, auditors, or investors. It is intentionally visual, redundant, and rigorous so that every stakeholder can trace how evidence is gathered, triangulated, and notarised.

Verification macrocosm

Architecture diagram · source preserved below
View original Mermaid source
mindmap
  root((Operator Assurance))
    Launch Telemetry
      Recap dossier
      Sovereign dashboard
      Integrity timeline
    Mathematical Guarantees
      Bonding curve invariants
      Reserve solvency proofs
      Validator quorum attestations
    Compliance Envelope
      Whitelist matrix
      Owner actuators
      Emergency exit posture
    Independent Triangulation
      Deterministic trade ledger
      First-principles simulator
      On-chain state introspection

The orchestrator records local scenario signals in reviewable artifacts. Replay compares accounting and curve calculations with the recorded local-chain snapshot. The self-hash detects accidental corruption; an attacker who rewrites a fully consistent recap can recompute it, so this is not authentication. The embedded verification.summary retains four historical checks for compatibility; the offline verifier and integrity report apply additional checks. Their denominators can differ, and each must report its own passed/total count.

The empowerment stanza rides on top of the verification bundle, summarizing the count of scripted demo events per command. The dashboard, console, and integrity dossier all read the same automation, assurance, capital, and command-deck metrics directly from the recap, keeping descriptive scenario metrics consistent without turning them into independently measured outcomes.

Operator flow – five minute audit

  1. npm run demo:alpha-agi-mark – generate the recap dossier and sovereign dashboard.
  2. npm run verify:alpha-agi-mark – replay the trade ledger and recompute curve maths from first principles.
  3. npm run verify:alpha-agi-mark:stochastic – execute 250 Monte Carlo stress runs and emit the stochastic proof dossier.
  4. npm run integrity:alpha-agi-mark – assemble the confidence dossier ready for board review.
  5. npm run dashboard:alpha-agi-mark (optional) – re-render the cinematic HTML dashboard from any recap snapshot.

Run these commands from the repository root after locked dependency setup. Verifiers exit nonzero on schema, checksum or accounting failure. Preserve the failed evidence and correct the source issue before regenerating reports.

Cross-check choreography

Architecture diagram · source preserved below
View original Mermaid source
graph TD
  subgraph A[Primary Orchestrator]
    R{Recap JSON}
    T[Trade Ledger]
    O[Owner Parameter Matrix]
    TL[Timeline]
  end
  subgraph B[Independent Verifier]
    Z[Zod schema guards]
    S[Simulation Engine]
    C[Checksum Auditor]
    P[Phase Coverage Scanner]
  end
  R --> Z
  T --> S
  TL --> P
  O --> P
  Z --> C
  S --> C
  P --> C
  C -->|Confidence Index| D[Integrity Dossier]
  D -->|Confidence ≥ 99%?| Verdict{Auto-Signoff}
  Verdict -->|Yes| ✅[Stakeholder Sign-off]
  Verdict -->|No| 🛑[Operator Escalates]

The new Phase Coverage Scanner enforces that the mission timeline spans orchestration through launch and that a verification milestone is documented. This protects against incomplete operator narratives sneaking through the review process.

Stochastic assurance lattice

Architecture diagram · source preserved below
View original Mermaid source
flowchart TD
  subgraph Deterministic[Deterministic Verification]
    Ledger[Ledger Replay]
    Curve[Bonding Curve Maths]
    Checksums[Checksum Auditor]
  end
  subgraph Stochastic[Stochastic Probe]
    Monte[Monte Carlo Engine]
    Invariants[Invariant Sentinels]
    Markdown[Mermaid Dossier]
  end
  Ledger --> Curve --> Checksums
  Monte --> Invariants --> Markdown
  Checksums --> Fusion{Confidence Fusion}
  Markdown --> Fusion
  Fusion -->|Unified verdict| Operator
  Operator -->|Brief stakeholders| Boardroom

The Monte Carlo harness produces alpha-mark-stochastic-proof.json and a matching Markdown brief so operators can show deterministic and stochastic layers converging on the same verdict. The dossier includes reserve and supply windows, pie-chart coverage, and invariant tables that mirror the deterministic checks.

Timeline integrity lenses

Architecture diagram · source preserved below
View original Mermaid source
sequenceDiagram
  participant Op as Operator
  participant TL as Mission Timeline
  participant VS as Verification Suite
  participant DA as Dashboard

  Op->>TL: Inspect orders and phases
  TL-->>Op: Strictly increasing sequence (1..n)
  VS->>TL: Validate coverage for Orchestration, Market Activation, Governance, Launch
  VS-->>Op: ✅ Verified core phases present
  VS->>TL: Search for Verification milestone
  TL-->>VS: Triple-verification matrix recorded
  VS->>DA: Render integrity panel with phase badges
  DA-->>Op: Cinematic dashboard confirms coverage

Presenting to stakeholders

Architecture diagram · source preserved below
View original Mermaid source
flowchart LR
  subgraph Boardroom
    Execs((Executive Council))
    Aud((Auditors))
    Inv((Investors))
  end
  subgraph OperatorConsole
    Console{{Operator Command Console}}
    Compendium[[Verification Compendium]]
    Dashboard[[Sovereign Dashboard]]
    Integrity[[Integrity Dossier]]
  end
  Console --> Compendium
  Console --> Dashboard
  Console --> Integrity
  Compendium --> Execs
  Compendium --> Aud
  Compendium --> Inv
  Dashboard --> Execs
  Integrity --> Aud
  Integrity --> Inv

The compendium pairs with the existing Operator Command Console and Sovereign Dashboard. Together they let a single operator hold the attention of a room full of executives and auditors, proving that AGI Jobs v0 (v2) gives them control over a launch infrastructure that once required an entire engineering organisation.

Further reading

← Back to Alpha AGI Mark